logo

Written by Gray | 15 May 2012


TMac's back, back in Teal and that's where he's going to stay, for at least one more season anyway.

After the Sharks abysmally early first season exit, many assumed Todd McLellan was on his way out the door. He was brought in to do one thing, and that was win a Cup. In four years, he has yet to accomplish this goal. He did manage to help Team Teal
get to the Conference Finals twice in back to back years, although that feat was sandwiched between two very early exits.

Part of the problem for McLellan is that anything short of the Finals (and I contend WINNING those Finals) is considered a failure.
Part of this comes from how and when TMac came into the Sharks organization. He was brought in on a high note, having just won the Cup with Detroit, and having a very solid winning record that promised a lot. Ron Wilson had just been given the boot after several consistent,
but largely disappointing, second round exits. The team didn't seem to want to play for him anymore, and it showed. Fans rode high
on the fact that TMac had won at every level he had coached for and hoped, perhaps even assumed that he would immediately lead the Sharks to a Cup.

It didn't work that way.

This year showcased many of the same issues that played the team last season; inconsistency, poor special teams play, lack of secondary scoring. Clearly something was amiss with the system, but it couldn't have been the only thing. I believe that TMac has a good sense for how the team should be playing, but translating that into a winning system is harder than it seems. It's a combination of many things, including personal buying in, your assistant coaches, and the guys you have on your team.

Take the blue line for example. Douglas Murray and Dan Boyle are to fairly solid D-men that compliment each other and make up for the others weaknesses. This season though, both seemed to have lost a step. How much does it hurt your team overall when your top defensive pair suddenly is playing like they should be your second or third?

Injuries plagued the Sharks, preventing many of them from ever hitting their stride. The PK was just awful. Passive and ineffective, it seemed more inclined to wait for the play to come to it rather than challenge aggressively before the opposing team crossed into the Sharks' zone. There was no neutral zone control at all. Passes were all over the place and no one seemed to be communicating
effectively night after night. Niemi started out alright but then struggled down the back half. Griess looked to e the saving grace in net, but he to faltered down the stretch.

All these issues seem to be more of a perfect storm of things happening all at once, rather than the results of one man. Team management seems to think so too, as they are supposedly giving Todd the green light, while potentially shuffling his assistant. It could be that his method was being executed or communicated well at the assistant level. Woodcroft might be brilliant on video ut not as good at the PK.
Matt Shaw was accused of being unemotional and disconnected during the time he filled in for an injured Todd McLellan. Perhaps the Sharks simply lackthe right combination of coaches behind the bench. Perhaps they need to shake up some of their now aging core and focus on growing their younger players. Perhaps winning it all isn't as easy as it looks.

Either way, I'm fine with the decision to keep TMac here in San Jose. I think he's a good coach with very good potential, but not everything has fully clicked yet. Look at a guy like Barry Trotz. He's taken how long to get his team to round 2 and Nashville has stood behind him. It's a combination of things that get your team to the promised land, not just one man. Hopefully, rounding out the bench with some fresh blood, a few trades and moves over the summer, and the Sharks will be sitting pretty to make a real run for th Cup in the 2012-2013 season.
no comments

Written by Gray | 06 May 2012

Well, it took awhile, but I finally found something I want to blog about. It's not like I've suffered from a shortage of potential subject matter. The Sharks ownership group gave Doug Wilson the thumbs up to continue as GM, Vlasic and Braun headed off to Worlds (Vlasic is now out with a MCL sprain), McLellan's tenure as head coach remains up in the air (but still seems more certain than it does for some of his assistants), trade rumors and rosterbation are in full swing, and the Kings are well on their way to driving Sharks fans crazy. Lost amongst all that written noise that was a tweet. A tweet lead me to the story about Sarah Phillips and how she conned a great many people in the sports betting and blogging world. That caught my attention for you see, I too, have run afoul of a con artist. I wanted to help people understand how easy it is to be caught up in something like that and how much you hate yourself after.

We all think we can spot them a mile away; con artist just out for a quick buck or a thrill, but in reality it's not that simple. ESPN is learning that the hard way and I did too. For many reasons I am disinclined to give details, but the parallels between my experience and Ben and Matt's was pretty stunning. Looking for a way to make money, offered a pretty good deal that checks out fairly well, many people would jump at the chance Sarah Phillips offered. And that's the point. While I was out of work, Ben was dazzled by the potential, and Matt was caught up in what he thought was a business deal, the basic idea is the same. Add enough realism, put on a show, have forms, files, phones numbers, company names, everything people check out to back it up. Be confident. It's pretty easy from there.

I checked my opportunity out like mad. I had other people check it out. It was pretty clean. It looked good. So I went for it just like Ben and Matt did. They had the added lure of thinking they were entering into business deals with someone who worked for ESPN. That's not a chance you screw up. You take it and run. It's only later that you realize what all the signs were and how hard the con artist worked to make you ignore them. How much they do their best to keep you too distracted to notice what is really going on. Like a magician's slight of hand, they get you to see everything but what they don't want you to.

My losses we relatively small compared to Matt's and likely less emotional than Ben's, but I can still sympathize with what they went through. You never feel more utterly shamefully stupid than after your realize someone took advantage of you. We're all supposed to be smarter than this but we aren't. We never were and now that fact is dangling right there in front of your face. People will judge you for it, ask how you could be so stupid, but the thing is cons work because the people running them are good at what they do. This is their job. If they want to stay in business (and out of jail) they need to be convincing. They're way more subtle then what we see on tv. They aren't Sawyer in a cheap hotel room "accidentally" dropping open a suitcase full of money, they're normal looking, regular folks who blend in well and seem reasonable. They'll have evidence to back up their claims and even meeting them face to face won't necessarily out them. They lie for a living and when you do that, you can fool just about anyone.

Bear this in mind when you start to joke around about how stupid Ben and Matt might be or you too may one day find yourself on the other side, lost and pissed off with nothing to show for it but a red face and a tough lesson learned.


no comments

Written by Gray | 22 April 2012

First off, I'd like to congratulate the Blues on their series win last night. Couldn't be a nicer group of rivals fans on the internet. They've been waiting a long time for this day. I hope your boys do well in round 2. I don't normally cheer for teams the eliminate the Sharks, but I'm fully on the Blues bandwagon this year. There's no way I root for the Kings in round 2. Hell no. Blues all the way. If you want to experience the awesome Blues community for yourself check out St. Louis Game Time and Bloguin's own Thrashing the Blues.

Over the next few days to weeks, I'll be doing my own versions of post mortems, hopefully talking about why we fans even bother with the playoffs at all, considering the stress levels, and making guesses as to what's going to happen during the off season.

Until then, I'll be taking a few days to mull over the season before blogging about it. Keep checking back during the summer, as I'll have some cartoons, silly articles, and things close to real analysis for you.
no comments

Written by Gray | 15 April 2012

Last night was a game, a few rounds of WWE and MMA all mixed into one. The Sharks looked gassed, but managed to split the series and are heading back to San Jose tied 1-1. Considering how they looked last night, I'll take it.

Nemo stood on his head once again, keeping the Sharks in the game when they struggled. It could have been a lot worse. The Sharks played relatively well in the first, own goals ignored, but slowed way down in the 2nd and 3rd, allowing St. Louis to carry the game. Forced to play the Blues game, the Sharks looked labored, slow, and disconnected. They feel victim to their own frustrations, and instead of playing hockey, tried to play Duck style (read as goonish) hockey. It was not successful.

There were a bunch of penalties, 88 PIM handed out after the last buzzer alone, continuing the trend of undisciplined games where high hits and lack of class from both sides are ignored by the refs until it's way too late. At this point, Burns isn't likely to have a hearing regarding his elbow throwing, Sobotka isn't going to have a hearing for sucker punching Moore (who didn't seem at all included to fight) and they trying to pummel him once he fell to the ice. To his credit, when Moore moved into a defensive posture and shouted, Sobotka stopped and just hung above him, fist ready but not moving. Andy MacDonald claimed Galiardi threw an elbow so hard his helmet cracked, which prompted Galiardi to troll back with a comment about his cracked shoulder pads.

It's never a good sign when there's more to be said about the fisticuffs and shenanigans in the game than the play, but that really sums up the direction the game took last night. It's like the Sharks and Blues heard about the Rangers and Sens and said "we can do that" then kinda did, got tired, took a nap in the middle, then woke back up at the very end. The Sharks would be well advised to stay clear of such tactics come Monday, especially if they want to take both games at the Tank and go back to St. Louis with a lead.

And what do you think, Ray Ratto?

Get Adobe Flash player
Awwwww yeah. no comments

Written by Gray | 12 April 2012

WHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO what a game THAT was!

saucy Jumbo is saucy
Whoever made this gif is a genius.
Double OT for game one? A comeback tie with less than 6 minutes left in the third? A 1st OT period that the Sharks survived ONLY because of Niemi? A win over the Blues in their barn? What a ride!

Teams should hand out oxygen tanks for the playoffs so we can all keep breathing during the game. There was something desperate in my desire for the Sharks to take game one, to not be the one failed upset win in game one. Usually I can sail through a game without too many emotional highs and lows, but come of the playoffs all bets are off.

The Sharks HAVE to win this one. The HAVE to. They need to prove that they CAN win against the Blues. More than anything, they have to put the regular season behind them and focus on getting out of round 1 victorious. There's simply no other choice.
Ok, there IS another choice but I don't really like it so, I'm pretending it doesn't exist.

I listened to the game, huddled around my radio, wondering, "Why do I do this to myself? Why do I WANT this so bad very season. The playoffs are too stressful OMGWHYCAN'TYOUCLEARTHEZONEJUSTCLEARTHEZONE??!??"

All I want is for the Sharks to beat the Blues. Is that so much to ask? Is it statistically impossible? The Sharks seemed to be taking the 1st and 2nd into their hands and controlling the game, but the Blues came back on in the third. The tying goal found the back of the net just a minute into the third. Why did it have to be the third?! Why not the second?! There's WAY MORE hockey left if it happens at the start of the second. Now, wait a minute here, lets calm down. It's not like the Sharks haven't come back to win before. They can do this. I know they can! Even as the minutes ticked away...they just need to get to OT! All the Sharks need is to get to OT!

I cheered out loud for Desi's tying goal. It was like a verbal release of the stress of game 1. Thank the hockey gods, the Sharks still have a chance. THE GAME IS TIED.
listening to the game in a dark car
I listened to the end of the 1st OT in my garage. It would have been bad luck to get out. (the penalty call is from the third but ehh)
There's this weird phenomenon in hockey where you can feel a play building and turn into a goal before a team actually scores. That was the feeling of the entire 1st OT period. St. Louis always seemed to be on the verge of a goal. I really don't know how the Sharks managed to escape that period alive. Nemo held them in, but St. Louis was buzzing. They had 14 shots in the OT period, compared to the Sharks 8. Not a huge discrepancy, but large enough to get the win if Nemo isn't on top of his game. Generally being on your heels for 20 minutes is NOT a good thing, but the hockey gods must have been smiling on the Sharks (or watching baseball) to give them a pass. At this point I see RudyKelly tweet something about the 4 OT loss to Dallas a few years ago and suddenly I start to wonder just how long this first game will go. ( I also wanted to kick RudyKelly in the nuts, but he'd probably enjoy it)

Double OT begins, this time on my TV instead of the radio. Suddenly living on the West Coast looks really good to all the fans up watching a very late East Coast game. The pressure seems to be back and forth, back and forth, each team getting chances before chasing down the puck in the opposite end. It ended in 3 minutes and 34 seconds, but it felt like an hour. 

There is a little bit of controversy surrounding the play, whether it was a pick or not. Milbury claims the Sharks cheated, but Mike Milbury probably believes the moon is made of cheese. It's possible the linesman missed the call there, but then again, they miss picks against the Wings all the time, so you tell me how often that play is called. Either way, Couture gets the puck to Clowe who sets up Havlat for a beautiful slap shot to end the game. The Sharks take a very important game one from the Blues, 3-2.

Game two is Saturday at 4:30pm. Find it on TSN, CNBC, RDSI, CSN-CA HD and on the radio at 98.5/102.1 KFOX.


no comments

Written by Gray | 10 April 2012

The first round of the Playoffs starts Thursday for the Sharks, and I have NO IDEA what to write. Nothing. None. Nada. Zip. Zlich. Zero. The regular season's over, it's been covered. The Clowegates and Mitchell hits, the running Couture, the Ray Rattos, the Nemos, the injuries, rebounds, defense, offense, Jumbo mammoth tusks, all covered. Now here we are, with the Sharks as the 7th seed, a spot many people did not think they could have attained just a month or two ago, and the playoffs starting and I find my mind more blank than the metaphorical slab. I'm excited, I'm happy, I'm ready to go, but when it comes to putting all that into words?

uhm...
The only thing I do know if that I am picking the Sharks in 6. Why? Well, for one thing, I _ALWAYS_ pick the Sharks to win because their my team. Odds? WTF do I care about odds? For another? Well, who cares if I am right or wrong, it's not like I make my living do this. I just guess. Sharks in 6. Book it, haters.
no comments

Written by Gray | 31 March 2012

After a disappointing and frustrating loss to the Coyotes on Thursday, the Sharks found themselves back outside of the playoff picture looking in. While none of us expected them to go 8-0 down the stretch, the time for losses was running brutally short. Every win matters and this was one win they did not get. There isn't much room for failure, if you lose, you are out and this game brought that fact home. 9th place. Is that as good as the Sharks really are this year? Can that be possible?



Sure, Ray Ratto has some good points; if you really are the best team in the division, act like it. Go out and win games, show everyone you're still the boss. But it doesn't work like that. You can want something more than anything and still fall short. "Try harder" will not always result in accomplishing your goals. Pretty amazing how that works. You don't just magically win because you want to. Hell, how many people wanted to "just win the lotto" last night? How well did that work out for the vast majority of you? Not so good? Well, just win the damn lotto next time.

Drew maybe overly optimistic, but I think he has a better understanding of how the sport of hockey works, and what the guys in the locker room are really going through each night. Ratto is like the angry fan, demanding results with no real understanding of how those results are created. Drew believes that hard work will get a team where it wants to be, even when their record is stacked against them. Neither is entirely wrong but neither is entirely right either. There is hope there, more than you think, but it's not as simple as just winning the game.

You can be frustrated all you want, as a fan you have every right to be, but to assume that the Sharks are out there without the will to win everynight is preposterious. no comments